Diagnose before changing
Redesign the weak parts without losing the valuable ones
I treat redesign as a product and technical problem: understand the current evidence, fix structural friction, and protect search visibility and working journeys during the move.
Outline this projectWhere it fits
A useful build begins with the problem it removes.
- 01A dated experience that no longer reflects the business
- 02Slow or fragile front-end implementation
- 03A migration where URLs and search equity matter
- 04A site whose content hierarchy has stopped making sense
The working scope
What the engagement can cover.
Current-state diagnosisContent and information architectureResponsive redesign and buildRedirect and migration planningAccessibility and performance review
BoundaryThe work is evidence-led. I will not fabricate before-and-after results or promise rankings that cannot be controlled.
Control the risk
Understand the current stateAgree the release boundaryPrototype the difficult partsBuild in testable slicesValidate before launch
Before we start
Does the scope need to be fully defined?
No. A clear problem and useful context are enough to begin. Scope is part of the work, not homework you must finish alone.
Will the technology be chosen first?
No. The product, operational constraints and future ownership determine the technical approach.